21
Sat, Sep
17 New Articles

Former WWE employee files allegations against doctor related to Vince McMahon abuse lawsuit

WWE
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Former WWE employee Janel Grant has filed a pre-action discovery petition against Peak Wellness, Inc and its owner Carlon M Colker MD.

The filing states “Upon information and belief, Dr. Colker routinely treats employees and talent of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. n/k/a World Wrestling Entertainment, LLC (“WWE”), headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.”
The new filing claims several connections to the lawsuit that Grant filed in January against Vince McMahon, WWE and John Laurinaitis alleging sexual trafficking and abuse – that suit is currently on stay at the request of the US government as it conducts its own investigation into the defendants.

The filing, which includes multiple new allegations, reads as follows:
1. This is a pre-action discovery petition brought forth pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-156a.
2. Plaintiff Janel Grant (“Plaintiff” or “Ms. Grant”) is a resident of Stamford, Connecticut.
3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Carlon M. Colker, M.D. (“Dr. Colker”) resides at (redacted address).
4. At all times relevant to this action, Dr. Colker has been a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of Connecticut.

5. Defendant Peak Wellness, Inc. (“Peak Wellness,” and together with Dr. Colker, “Defendants”) is a Connecticut corporation with a principal place of business located at (redacted address).
6. Upon information and belief, Peak Wellness is wholly owned by Dr. Colker, who serves as the Director.
7. Peak Wellness operates a medical center that markets itself as providing traditional medical care along with advanced diagnostics, functional medicine, naturopathy, physical medicine, anti-aging, and aesthetics. Among the services offered are private concierge medicine, customized vitamin protocols, medical cannabis, weight loss counseling, physical performance testing, facial injectables, and an I.V. drip lounge.
8. Dr. Colker is Chief Executive Officer and Medical Director of the medical center. Upon information and belief, Dr. Colker routinely treats employees and talent of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. n/k/a World Wrestling Entertainment, LLC (“WWE”), headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

9. In a federal complaint dated January 25, 2024, Ms. Grant brought, inter alia, sex trafficking and sexual assault claims against the WWE, its Founder and Executive Chairman Vincent K. McMahon (“McMahon”), and its former executive John Laurinaitis, which are currently pending in the United States District Court, District of Connecticut.
10. Ms. Grant is a former employee of the WWE, having worked there from June 2019 through March 2022.
11. In or about November 2019, McMahon arranged that Ms. Grant see Dr. Colker to treat her fatigue and insomnia.
12. At McMahon’s direction, Ms. Grant began seeing Dr. Colker regularly. From November 22, 2019 through April 15, 2022, Ms. Grant saw Dr. Colker or another practitioner at Peak Wellness on at least 60 occasions.

13. On multiple visits, Dr. Colker prescribed Ms. Grant with “adrenal trays” or “adrenal supplement trays,” provided by his office and instructed her to take the unmarked pills daily. Dr. Colker did not explain the substances, dosages, or purpose of the pills to Ms. Grant beyond purportedly addressing her symptoms of fatigue. When Ms. Grant asked Dr. Colker about the substance of the supplement trays, and specifically which substance(s) caused her to experience nausea, he responded with pushback about trust, including, “If you don’t trust me, we have bigger problems.”
14. Dr. Colker also prescribed weekly I.V. infusions, and similarly did not disclose the substance of the infusions to Ms. Grant, other than a generalized description in a “drip lounge” menu. These treatments caused Ms. Grant to feel unwell during the I.V. sessions, which Dr. Colker attributed to individual “tolerance.”
15. Additionally, an employee of Peak Wellness also was involved in several instances of sexual abuse against Ms. Grant by McMahon as further described in Ms. Grant’s federal complaint.
16. On Ms. Grant’s last visit to Peak Wellness in April 2022, Dr. Colker demanded that she sign a statement that required her to provide a credit card to pay for her visits to the clinic. When Ms. Grant refused, Dr. Colker berated her and asked, “What’s the matter, Janel – is there a problem with money? Is this about the NDA?”

17. By letters dated February 5, 2024 and March 20, 2024, Ms. Grant, through counsel, requested her medical records from Peak Wellness in electronic format pursuant to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”).
18. In response to each letter, Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness provided records to Ms. Grant’s counsel in paper copies only. Peak Wellness used electronic recordkeeping for Ms. Grant’s medical records, as she was instructed to utilize an iPad for administrative purposes, such as patient intake, in the Peak Wellness office. To date, despite repeated requests, Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness has failed or refused to provide Ms. Grant’s electronic medical records, including any associated metadata.
19. Upon review, Ms. Grant and her counsel noticed that the provided paper records are incomplete and inaccurate. For example, there are billing records that do not have a corresponding medical record, medical records that do not have a corresponding billing record, inconsistent billing rates, and double charges.
20. The medical records provided by Peak Wellness also do not contain a copy of Peak Wellness’ Privacy Policy, despite the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) requirement that covered entities distribute a plain-language Notice of Privacy Practices to all patients describing their policies for using and distributing protected health information.

21. Additionally, each of the “Patient Receipts” Defendants provided itemize the charges for each service provided and indicate that “Patient Paid” the full amount. However, Ms. Grant never received or paid a single medical bill from either Peak Wellness or Dr. Colker.
22. Upon information and belief, McMahon and/or WWE paid each of Ms. Grant’s medical bills from Peak Wellness and Dr. Colker, totaling over $51,000.
23. Further, Dr. Colker had personal knowledge of the circumstances surrounding a purported non-disclosure agreement at issue in the Federal Action. Specifically, during the negotiation of the purported non-disclosure agreement, McMahon approved of Ms. Grant asking Dr. Colker for an attorney referral. Dr. Colker recommended Defendants’ attorney to Ms. Grant and, upon McMahon’s approval, Ms. Grant engaged that attorney to represent her in the negotiation of the purported non-disclosure agreement.
24. Plaintiff seeks records and testimony from Defendants regarding:

a. Plaintiff’s electronic medical records, including all associated metadata;
b. Defendants’ recordkeeping and billing procedures;
c. Payment records relating to Ms. Grant;
d. Defendants’ payment arrangements with McMahon and/or the WWE;

e. The purpose of Ms. Grant’s prescribed treatments;
f. The substance of Ms. Grant’s prescribed treatments;
g. Any communications between Dr. Colker and McMahon relating to Ms. Grant; and
h. Dr. Colker’s involvement in recommending Ms. Grant’s attorney for negotiation of the purported non-disclosure agreement

25. The information that Ms. Grant has requested is material and necessary to determine whether Defendants were civil conspirators in her pending claims against McMahon and the WWE.
26. The information is also material and necessary to determine whether Defendants have engaged in falsifying medical records, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) violations, RICO conspiracy, assault, battery, and/or breaches of fiduciary against Ms. Grant.
27. Plaintiff has potential causes of action sounding in civil conspiracy, aiding and abetting, fraud, assault, battery, RICO, RICO conspiracy, and/or breach of fiduciary duty that will be supported by the materials sought.
28. As the parties in control of Ms. Grant’s medical records, Defendants are the sole parties in possession of the information in question.
29. Plaintiff has no other adequate remedy at law to obtain the materials requested.
30. As this petition is the sole remedy at law that allows Plaintiff to determine the existence of a cause of action against Dr. Colker and/or Peak Wellness, granting this petition will prevent a failure or delay in justice.

Responding to the filing, a Vince McMahon spokesperson told Wrestlenomics in a statement:
“Ms. Grant’s petition for pre-action discovery against Dr. Colker is a direct violation of the court-ordered stay, and nothing more than an attempt to generate publicity on her false allegations and to harass people connected to Mr. McMahon, who is being sued by Ms. Grant in a separate matter. The facts are that Ms. Grant told Mr. McMahon she was fatigued and asked him to recommend a doctor. Ms. Grant called Dr. Colker and became a patient of his. Her statement in the filing is inconsistent with her prior remarks. Ms. Grant never had anything but good things to say about the doctor when speaking to Mr. McMahon and others about him.”
Grant’s attorney Ann Callis stated:
“We did not violate a federal stay by filing a state action against a non-defendant.”

We’ll keep you posted with any further details.
For all the latest WWE news, click here.

Comments powered by CComment